Mardi 30 septembre 2008
2
30
/09
/2008
22:03
Children do more for the future of human kind than scientits in their laboratories, in good and in bad ways. And there's a good reason for that.
Take a look at that true scene: "How, the hell, did you get here, in my lab? " said the half bold man with glasses, his face red, and his eyes full of blasting electricity.
"Well, Doc, I'm sorry, but yesterday, you came and get me? You did come, and asked me questions about my life, so it seemed to me clear, that I shall come and visit you and , the... "whopper"? "
The Doc was near to heart attack, "What do you mean, you had to come, and what are you talking about, it's not a fast-food facility here! How did you get in?" . " Well, Doc, like Mom always said:
Hello, then the lift, push the open door, smile and here I am." " This just can't be..." thought the Doc...
Good, what it clearly states is that scientists' minds only accept as possible what they consider, as they have already observed and checked themselves. Out of their maps, the
world is a foggy space. Back in the Nineteenth century, M. Jules Verne, and H.G. Wells with their stories of trip to the moon or leagues under the sea, were two folkloric writers, inspired by
science but understanding nothing to it, like mockers of the great western universities loved to say in high society cocktails. And microbs, a microscopic world, you must be kidding M.
Pasteur...
Now, let's talk about something else: visualization. Space program and Olympic games trainers discovered that the more we visualized actions to be done, the more able to do
them in a short time we were, the more sure of our gestures we were, and finally, as result, the time between a decision was made in our grey cells and our flesh was moving to complete our
will, was reduced. The best performance was obtained with repetition, the more and more details of the action abandonned to our subconscient copilot, or autopilot acting for us. Why was it so
difficult to go to America five hundred years before: because most of the procedures were not existing. Nowadays, you buy a ticket, seat in a plane and a few hours later, you walk in Big Apple.
In between , humanity has written down in the great book of human mind the experiments of decades on the seas and getting familiar with air flights.
Training is a question of visualization, but this word seems to refer to a sense in relation with a pair of globes that are not working the same for everyone. It's not the
exact meaning for visualization and Stephen Hawking, with his glasses and body paralyzed still remains the greatest visualiser of the human kind. (Stephen, you're number One!). Because
visualization calls another notion our scientist don't like to deal with, for it makes them feel how much their knowledge is tiny: Dimensions. One good exemple is bats and their radar: they send
a signal, and receive the echo on their skin. Scientists explain this phenomenon, and Great-Britain owes many to bats-radar, talking about the Blitz.
Now, everyone can observe that when you're walking in the street and a woman is looking at you, you can feel her good vibrations on your neck, even if you first, didn't
notice her presence. The same for a Berserker looking for an enemy to empty his ragetank, bad vibrations, you also feel them. Question to the scientist: where are those vibrations, what if you
show us where they stands: no answer. Of course, they're not in the flat two-three dimensions.
Explainations: you used to call on a wire phone, and following the cable, you could walk from your flat to Washington ( using the experience of passed decades and M
Vernes' toys), all this in three dimensions. Nowadays, your mobile phone is transmitting to a relay , and then a few hops to the satellite before your voice, in waves comes down in Italy through
some relay. So Immaterial but still real. Where do vibrations, good and bad, stand? In an additional dimension.
When we learn, we visualize, we put down in another dimension, the path we find cool, sure, and appropriate to get the result we're looking for. Objection, objection,
objection! says the scientist attorney, " Everything is happening in your small bone box where you brain has his synapse connections." The objection equals to the answer : " Processes are
operating in the chips of your computer" where the question was to know "Where are the information transiting ? " and the answer should have be: "in electric signal."
Considering there is, or there are additional dimension(s) where you can write down, like on a black board, or a white board, all the experience you acquired and the orders you
give to the autopilot, a wide domain of knowledge is open. And of course, the question of exploration in those dimensions also comes. What is a man, who has the ability to travel in the other
dimension, understood, what is a man who can go in the backstage whenever he pleases, to take a look to the lights, the costumes, the make-up? And furthermore, what is a man, who can in real-time
get into your backyard dimension and check what you're currently doing when talking to him. An exemple, you invite a girl to have some bedtime story with her, but you look like a gentleman. The
girl opens the dimension door and check your list, discovering the postcards of the night you've imagined for you and her. Ends: she might have some other projects.
The more you visualize, the more you can anticipate reactions and the best you handle your partners reactions. This is the first step of a walk in evolution and of course will
need some more explainations about the link between matter and will.